When a model is partially offloaded to system RAM, we can either
do the calculations on the CPU or we can temporarily transfer the
data to the GPU to do the calculations there. Small batches tend
to be better on the CPU, large batches on the GPU.
The llamarunner used the GPU in most cases and the ollamarunner
used the CPU. Although the ollamarunner saw an improvement in
token generation performance, there was a large performance hit
in prompt processing (3-10x).
There is an existing heuristic to dynamically switch between these
two modes but in practice it doesn't have enough information to
accurately make that decision. This adds authoritative data to make
the check work to get the best of both worlds.
Fixes#12037
FromFloatSlice and FromIntSlice return an error if the shape doesn't
match the passed data or if memory can't be allocated. Since these
are inputs, the memory being allocated is system memory rather than VRAM.
In many cases, the caller can't really handle the error and panics.
Empty and Zeros directly panic if they can't allocate memory.
This makes things consistent by panicing for the first two cases,
removing a fair amount of error handling code. This is also consistent
with how Go typically handles these situations.
This provides granular information about the backend memory allocations
required by the runner:
- Per backend
- Per layer
- Weights, cache and graph
- Allocation status
This can be used for debugging and validating memory estimates.
We currently preallocate compute graph memory for the worst case
batch of text tokens. This adds support for doing the same for
images.
Note that image models are more complicated than text models in
how they process their inputs so there may be cases where this
approach isn't completely generic for all models. It covers all
currently supported models though.
For some multimodal models (such as gemma3), we create a single
graph that generates the image embedding and then use this in the
text model. The embedding tensor is completely opaque to the runner.
However, this doesn't work if we need to use the embedding in multiple
batches. This can arise if the embedding is larger than the batch size.
In these cases (as with llama4), we would like to create views that
are more appropriately sized. However, if we do this then the original
source tensor is used in multiple graphs, which isn't allowed. To
avoid that problem, models with this pattern compute the embedding
tensor on first use and recreate the individual views. There is no
longer a single vision and text graph.
This codifies the pattern of separating vision and text graphs. The
logic of computing tensors on demand is moved to the runner, so models
no longer have to worry about this. It also gives the runner visibility
into the multimodal tensors, which is important for memory management.
